UDC: 11
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-6-160


viewing

MY IMAGE OF THE UNIFIED KNOWLEDGE

E. V. Ryltsev
Nizhny Tagil State Socio-Pedagogical Institute (branch) Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, Nizhny Tagil, Russia
e-mail: optimist120804@yandex.ru

Abstract. The knowledge acquired by Mankind does not represent a single whole. Contradictions between religious and philosophical teachings and scientific theories exacerbate the already tense relations that, as a rule, develop between peoples, states and powerful organizations. The elimination of these contradictions is not a sufficient, but a necessary condition for building a just society on Earth, which will include all the peoples of the Earth. This task is very relevant for all progressive Mankind, has great practical significance. The purpose of the article is to contribute to the elimination of these contradictions. For thousands of years, the great minds of Mankind have strived to unite various parts of disparate knowledge. But Humanity is capable of building a Unified Knowledge – a system of knowledge composed of harmoniously connected true elements of religious and philosophical teachings and scientific theories created by all the peoples of the world throughout the history of Humanity. It should include the greatest religious ideas, the theory of knowledge, ontology, logic, fundamental ideas of physics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology and other similar important areas of knowledge. A special methodology is needed to build a Unified Knowledge. One of the options for such a methodology may be symphonics, the foundations of which were proposed by Daniil Valentinovich Pivovarov and his student, the author of this article. According to the author, in order to build a Unified Knowledge, one should strive to unite Christian and pagan teachings, mystical ideas about the structure of the World and classical ontology, ideas about the structure of matter in etherodynamics and ideas about particles of matter as living beings, achievements of modern astronomy and ancient astrology, achievements of modern chemistry and ancient alchemy, ideas about the evolution of the organic world and the Spiritual Hierarchy and other seemingly incompatible areas of knowledge. The main result of the article is the desire to unite the listed branches of knowledge into a single harmonious whole, which represents the scientific novelty of the study. The author of the article believes that in the future, a Unified Knowledge will be formed. This process will be very long. Many thousands of people will take part in such a grandiose work. But an individual is able to form in his consciousness a small part of the grandiose Unified Knowledge, its image. The author of the article offers such an image formed in his consciousness.

Keywords: knowledge, science, religion, methodology, God, Spiritual Hierarchy, paganism, spirit, matter.

Cite as:Ryltsev, E. V. (2024) [My Image of the Unified Knowledge]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 6, pp. 160–169. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-6-160.


References

  1. Andreev, D. L. (1991) Roza Mira [Rose of the World]. Moscow: Prometheus, 288 p.
  2. Atsyukovsky, V. A. (2020) Populyarnaya efirodinamika ili kak ustroyen mir, v kotorom my zhivem [Popular Etherodynamics, or How the World We Live in Is Structured]. Moscow: RadioSoft, 376 p.
  3. Atsyukovsky, V. A., Zigunenko, S. N. (1993) [Where the Etheric Wind Blows From]. Znak voprosa [Question Mark]. Vol. 1–2, pp. 85–111. (In Russ.).
  4. Budge, E. A. W. (2000) Yegipetskaya religiya. Yegipetskaya magiya [Egyptian Religion. Egyptian Magic]. Moscow: Aletheia, 392 p. (In Russ, transl. from Eng.).
  5. Besant, A. (2020) Drevnyaya mudrost’. Osnovy ezotericheskikh znaniy [Ancient Wisdom. Basics of Esoteric Knowledge]. M.: Amrita-Rus, 336 p. (In Russ, transl. from Eng.).
  6. Dawkins, R. (2022) Slepoy chasovshchik. Kak evolyutsiya dokazyvayet otsutstviye zamysla vo Vselennoy [The Blind Watchmaker. How evolution proves the absence of design in the Universe]. M.: ACT Publishing House: CORPUS, 496 p. (In Russ, transl. from Eng.).
  7. Kaku, M. (2022) Parallel’nyye miry: Ob ustroystve mirozdaniya, vysshikh izmereniyakh i budushchem kosmosa [Parallel Worlds: On the structure of the universe, higher dimensions, and the future of the cosmos]. M.: Alpina non-fiction, 720 p. (In Russ, transl. from Eng.).
  8. Moiseev, B. M. (2023) Osnovy i metody fundamental’noy teoreticheskoy fiziki: v 3 t. [Fundamentals and methods of fundamental theoretical physics: in 3 volumes]. M.: Sputnik +, Vol. 1, 297 p.
  9. Moiseev, B. M. (2020 Fizicheskaya priroda sveta: postkvantovaya kontseptsiya [The physical nature of light: the post-quantum concept]. Kostroma: Kostroma State University, 221 p. – EDN: DJAKZY.
  10. Moiseev, B. M. (2017) Fundamental’naya fizika, yeye filosofiya i zdravyy smysl [Fundamental Physics, Its Philosophy and Common Sense]. Moscow: LENAND, 432 p.
  11. Pivovarov, D. V. (2011) Sinteticheskaya paradigma v filosofii [Synthetic Paradigm in Philosophy]. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural. University, 536 p.
  12. Pivovarov, D. V., Ryltsev, E. V. (2009) Simfonika kak metodologiya tolerantnogo spora [Symphonics as a Methodology of Tolerant Debate]. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, 154 p.
  13. Polonsky, P. Vvedeniye v filosofiyu iudaizma [Introduction to the Philosophy of Judaism]. Available at: https://fb2.top/vvedenie-v-filosofivu-iudaizma-265290 (accessed: 10.02.2023) (In Russ.).
  14. Soloviev, V. S. (1990) Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Works: in 2 volumes]. 2nd ed. M.: Thouhgt, V. 2, 822 p.
  15. Spiral’ poznaniya. Mistika ustami mistikov [Spiral of knowledge. Mysticism through the lips of mystics]. M.: Progress-Culture, 448 p.