UDC: 332.1
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-3-25

INSTITUTIONAL READINESS OF THE REGIONS OF THE CENTRAL FEDERAL DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT ESG PRACTICES

А. А. Vetrenyuk
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: andreivetrenyuk@gmail.com

Abstract. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing importance of ESG principles (environmental, social, and governance aspects) for the sustainable development of regions. In the context of global climate change and socio-economic system transformation, the need for Russian regions to adapt to new sustainability standards is growing. However, the degree of readiness for ESG transformation varies across regions, requiring a comprehensive analysis of institutional frameworks and governance mechanisms.

The objective of the study is to analyze the institutional readiness of the regions of the Central Federal District (CFD) to integrate ESG principles into their activities. The study examines the regulatory framework and organizational support for ESG practices, identifies opportunities for their development, and highlights key barriers.

The methodological framework of the study includes an analysis of regulatory legal acts, strategic regional documents, and a comparative analysis of ESG reporting data. The study employs content analysis, institutional analysis, and comparative analysis of regional sustainability policies.

The study reveals significant differentiation among CFD regions in terms of ESG agenda development. Moscow, the Moscow Region, and the Belgorod Region are leaders due to their comprehensive sustainable development strategies and strong regulatory frameworks. Other regions exhibit fragmented ESG initiatives, necessitating improvements in regulatory mechanisms and strengthening institutional capacity for ESG integration.

The scientific novelty of this study lies in the development of a typology of institutional readiness for ESG transformation, which enables the formulation of targeted recommendations for improving regulatory and organizational environments.

The practical significance of the study is in its potential application for shaping effective policies for ESG implementation in Russian regions.

Future research should focus on an in-depth analysis of factors influencing ESG transformation success, as well as examining international best practices for their adaptation to Russian conditions.

Recommendations based on the data obtained include unification of regulatory standards, the creation of a unified monitoring system, and the strengthening of organizational support for ESG transformation. Additionally, measures are proposed for developing educational programs to train ESG specialists and for digitizing ESG reporting.

Key words: ESG principles, institutional readiness, regulatory framework, organizational support, sustainable development, digital transformation, regional policy, non-financial reporting, ESG monitoring, sustainability strategies.

Cite as: Vetrenyuk A. A. (2025) [Institutional readiness of the regions of the Central Federal District to implement ESG practices]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 3, pp. 25–34. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-3-25.


References

  1. Bataeva, B. S., Kokurina, A. D., Karpov, N. A. (2021) [The Impact of ESG Indicators Disclosure on the Financial Performance of Russian Public Companies]. Upravlenec [Manager]. Vol. 12. No 6, p. 20–32. – https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-2. (In Russ.).
  2. Belousov, A. L. (2022) [Pravovye i organizacionnye aspekty vnedreniya esg-standartov v rossijskom bankovskom sektore]. Russian Journal of Economics and Law [Russian Journal of Economics and Law]. Vol. 16. No. 3, pp. 577–586. – https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.3.577-586. (In Russ.).
  3. Glushakova, O. V., Chernikova, O. P. (2023) [Institutionalization of ESG principles at the international level and in the Russian Federation, their impact on the activities of ferrous metallurgy enterprises. Part 1]. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Chernaya Metallurgiya [News of higher educational institutions. Ferrous Metallurgy]. Vol. 66. No 2, pp. 253–264. – https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2023-2-253-264. (In Russ.).
  4. Granberg, A. G. (2004) Osnovy regional’noj ekonomiki [Fundamentals of regional economics]. M.: ID GU VSHE, 495 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Ermakova, E. P. (2021) [ESG banking in Russia and the European Union: concept and problems of legal regulation]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and law]. Vol. 7, pp. 161–174. – https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520016188-7. (In Russ.).
  6. Ermohin, I. S., Burhanova, Yu. M., Levashenko, A. D. (2023) [The problem of divergence of assessments awarded by entities providing services for the assessment of sustainable development. The main trends in the field of legislative regulation of the ESG rating institute in Russia and the world]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacij: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika [Bulletin of International Organizations: Education, Science, New Economy]. Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 186–204. – https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2023-03-10. (In Russ.).
  7. Izmajlova, M. A. (2022) [Implementation of ESG strategies of Russian companies in the context of sanctions restrictions]. MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie) [MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Development)]. Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 185–201. – https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.2.185-201. (In Russ.).
  8. Izmajlova, M. A. (2023) [ESG agenda in Russia: modern development and mechanism of transformation of Russian companies. Part 1]. MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie) [MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Development)]. Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 344–360. – https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.3.344-360. (In Russ.).
  9. Morozova, I. A., Smetanina, A. I., Smetanin, A. S. (2024) [ESG strategy for managing sustainable digital transformation of business in the economy of artificial intelligence]. Ars Administrandi (iskusstvo upravleniya) [Ars Administrandi (The art of Administration)]. Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 217–239. – https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2024-2-217-239. (In Russ.).
  10. Murach, A. A., Storchevoj, M. A., Sepulveda, M. (2024) [ESG ratings discrepancy: international and Russian experience]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic policy]. Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 84–121. – https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-4-84-121. (In Russ.).
  11. Nekrasov, N. N. (1978) Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya, problemy, metody [Regional Economy: Theory, Problems, Methods]. M.: Economics, 344 p.
  12. Sannikova, I. N., Semikolenova, M. N. (2024) [Non-financial reporting: the practice of forming and monitoring ESG data]. Ekonomika. Professiya. Biznes. [Economy. Profession. Business]. Vol. 1, pp. 64–71. – https://doi.org/10.14258/epb202409. (In Russ.).
  13. Starodubceva, E. B., Trachenko, M. B. (2023) [Esg-razvitie rossijskih kompanij: orientir na rynki Aziatsko- Tihookeanskogo regiona i Blizhnego Vostoka]. Vestnik universiteta [Bulletin of the University]. Vol. 5, pp. 105–112. – https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-5-105-112. (In Russ.)
  14. Strizhov, S. A., Abramovich, S. Yu. (2023) [The role of leading financial institutions in the implementation of the ESG agenda]. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and management]. Vol. 29. No. 10, pp. 1228–1238. – https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-10-1228-1238. (In Russ.).
  15. Saushkin, Y. G. (1973) Ekonomicheskaya geografiya: istoriya, teoriya, metody, praktika [Economic geography: history, theory, methods, practice]. M.: Thought, 559 p.
  16. Fejgin, Y. G. (1954) Razmeshchenie proizvodstva pri kapitalizme i socializme [Placement of production under capitalism and socialism]. M.: Gospolitizdat, 552 p.
  17. Hachaturov, T. S. (1964) Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ kapital’nyh vlozhenij [Economic efficiency of capital investments]. M.: Economics, 280 p.
  18. Anikin, D., et al. (2023) Developing the Esg Rating Methodology for Russian Companies. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. Vol. 11. No. 1, pp. 1–19. – https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.308. (In Eng.).
  19. Singhania, M., & Saini, N. (2021) Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. Vol. 13. No. 1, pp. 516– 559. – https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1964810. (In Eng.).
  20. Xia, W. (2022) A Systematic Review: How Does Organisational Learning Enable ESG Performance (from 2001 to 2021). Sustainability. Vol. 14. No. 24. – https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416962. (In Eng.).