UDC: 334.7
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-5-39
EDN: XEAZOJ


viewing

IT-COMPANIES AS ORCHESTRATORS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS

V. A. Yakimova1, D. A. Vinokurov2
Amur State University, Blagoveshchensk, Russia
1e-mail: vilena_yakimova@mail.ru
2e-mail: danila.vinokurov.19@mail.ru

Abstract.The article is devoted to the problem of strategic management of business systems in which the functions of an orchestrator are performed by an enterprise in the ICT sector. The purpose of the study is to identify types of strategies for organizing entrepreneurial ecosystems and describe their features in the context of the development of the digital economy. During the research process, a selection of 100 IT companies that were leaders in terms of revenue for 2021–2023 was studied. and their growth. Cluster analysis methods were used to test ecosystem criteria in relation to the ICT sector, typology methods and the construction of descriptive models.

Statistical analysis showed that despite the reduction in the number of enterprises, in modern conditions there has been a tendency to increase the share of enterprises in the ICT sector in the economy. During the study of a sample of IT companies – industry leaders, 5 clusters were formed, the most typical characteristics of which were used to identify distinctive features. It was found that 56% of the studied sample of IT enterprises become orchestrators for entrepreneurial ecosystems, which corresponds to clusters 1–4. As a result of the similarity analysis, it was determined that in practice the strategy of acceleration, partnership, integration and customer-oriented strategy is used. For each type of orchestrator strategy, models have been generated and key features have been identified. A customer-centric orchestrator strategy is the most preferable for rapid growth and scale-up.

The results obtained have important practical significance for organizing ecosystems with the leading role of the IT company orchestrator and choosing the most effective strategy. In further research, it is necessary to identify specific management actions and tools that are applicable for each type. In continuation, it is necessary to assess the productivity of ecosystems, taking into account the types of strategies and highlighting their competitive advantages.

Key words: оrchestrator, digital platform, digital ecosystem, entrepreneurial ecosystem, strategy.

Acknowledgements. This article was prepared by the research through the grant of the Russian Science Foundation № 23-28-00044 «Conceptual model of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem in a digital environment», https://rscf.ru/ project/23-28-00044/.

Cite as:Yakimova, V. A., Vinokurov, D. A. (2024) [IT-companies as orchestrators of entrepreneurial ecosystems]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 5, pp. 39–50. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077- 7175-2024-5-39.


References

  1. Akberdina, V. V., Vasilenko, E. V. (2023) [Basic strategies for the behavior of industry as a participant in regional innovation ecosystems]. AlterEconomics. [AlterEconomics]. Vol. 3, pp. 548–567. – https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-3.4. – EDN: XQPLMM. (In Russ.).
  2. Antonova, M. V., Molchanov, K. V. (2021) [Ecosystems in business: concept, types, main risks]. Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta kooperacii, jekonomiki i prava. [Bulletin of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law]. Vol. 6(91), pp. 62–70. – https://doi.org/10.21295/2223-5639-2021-6-62-70. – EDN: UVHISW. (In Russ.).
  3. Butkovskaya, G. V., Sumarokova, E. V. (2021) [Marketing technologies for managing relationships with clients: digital ecosystems]. University Bulletin. [Vestnik GUU]. Vol. 11, pp. 31–38. – https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-11-31-38. – EDN: UKHMSA. (In Russ.).
  4. Lyulyuchenko, M. V. (2021) [Aspects of the development of meso-level innovative ecosystems in the conditions of the formation of the digital economy]. Vestnik Altajskoj akademii jekonomiki i prava [Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law]. Vol. 9–2, pp. 160–166. – https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.1854. – EDN: DMOITT. (In Russ.).
  5. Ovchinnikova, A. V., Zimin, S. D. (2021) [The birth of the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems and its evolution]. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo [Economics, entrepreneurship and law]. Vol. 6, pp. 1497–1514. – https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.11.6.112307. – EDN: UQOBWL. (In Russ.).
  6. Popov, E. V. (2023) [Ecosystems of companies: formation of a research program]. Upravlenec [Manager]. Vol. 14(1), pp. 2–15. – https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-1-1. – EDN: NYJPSB. (In Russ.).
  7. Ramenskaya, L. A. (2020) [Application of the ecosystem concept in economic and management research]. Upravlenec. [Manager]. Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 16–28. – https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2. – EDN: BQQBJU. (In Russ.).
  8. Glukhov, V. V., et al. (2021) [Strategic management of industrial ecosystems based on the platform concept]. Jekonomika i upravlenie. [Economics and management]. Vol. 10 (192), pp. 751–765. (In Russ.).
  9. Tretyakova, E. A., Freiman, E. N. (2022) [Ecosystem approach in modern economic research]. Voprosy upravlenija. [Management Issues]. Vol. 1 (74), pp. 6–20. – https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2022-1-6-20. – EDN: QPUHDQ. (In Russ.).
  10. Cobben, D., et al. (2022) Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 142 (C), pp. 138–164. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046. (In Eng.).
  11. Cozzolino, A., Corbo, L., Aversa, P. (2021) Digital platform-based ecosystems: The evolution of collaboration and competition between incumbent producers and entrant platforms. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 126 (C), pp. 385–400. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.058. (In Eng.).
  12. Gianluca, E., Alessandro, M., Giuseppina, P. (2020) Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 150(C), pp. 119791. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791. (In Eng.).
  13. Gomes, L. A. d. V., et al. (2018) Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: evolution, gaps and trends. Technological forecasting and social change. Vol. 136, pp. 30–48. (In Eng.).
  14. Granstrand, O., Holgersson, M. (2020) Innovation ecosystems: a conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, Elsevier. Vol. 90. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098. (In Eng.).
  15. Harima, J. (2020). Public Accelerators in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Resource Orchestration in the Early Ecosystem Evolution. Berlin, Springer Gabler, 263 p. (In Eng.).
  16. Kohtamäki, M., et al. (2019) Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 104. No. pp. 380–392. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027. (In Eng.).
  17. Parida, V., Sjödin, D. R., Reim, W. (2019) Reviewing literature on digitalization, business model innovation, and sustainable industry: Past achievements and future promises. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 391. – https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020391. (In Eng.).
  18. Pushpananthan, G., Elmquist, M. (2022) Joining forces to create value: The emergence of an innovation ecosystem. Technovation. Vol. 115, No. C. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102453. (In Eng.).
  19. Trabskaja, J., Mets, T. (2019) Ecosystem as the Source of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 13, No 4, pp. 10–22. – https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22. (In Eng.).
  20. Vaillant, Y., Lafuente, E., Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2023). Assessment of Industrial Pre-Determinants for Territories with Active Product-Service Innovation Ecosystems. Technovation. Vol. 119, No. C, pp. 102658. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102658. (In Eng.).
Error