UDC: 141
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-1-11

WHAT IS NEO-KANTIANISM

V. N. Belov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: belov_vn@pfur.ru

Abstract. The article attempts to define the uniqueness of the leading trend in world philosophy of the late 19th – early 20th centuries. Moreover, the emphasis is placed on two important aspects of this uniqueness: the attitude of neo-Kantians to Kant and their persistent desire to begin the tradition of transcendental philosophy with the philosophy of Plato. In the attitude of neo-Kantians to Kant, the article highlights, first of all, four main features. The Kant of neo- Kantians is, firstly, historical Kant, secondly, systemic Kant, thirdly, Kant as the «spirit» of transcendental philosophy, an impetus for further development (to understand Kant means to go beyond him) and, finally, fourthly, modern Kant, helping to solve significant problems of our time. As for the significance of Plato for the entire tradition of idealistic transcendental philosophy, here the neo-Kantians are undoubtedly convinced that it was with Plato that the path of scientific philosophy began, the task of which is to clarify the conditions for the possibility of science in the knowledge of nature, man and society.

Key words: Marburg and Baden school of neo-Kantianism, Cohen, Windelband, Kant, Plato.

Cite as: Belov, V. N. (2025) [What is neo-Kantianism]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 1, pp. 11–26. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-1-11.


References

  1. Belov, V. N. (2018) [Autonomy of Reason and the Religion of Revelation in Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion]. Filosofiya religii: analiticheskiye issledovaniya [Philosophy of Religion: Analytical Studies]. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 51–64. – https://doi.org/10.21146/2587-683X-2018-2-2-51-64. (In Russ.).
  2. Belov, V. N. (2022) [Hermann Cohen on the Relationship between Judaism and Christianity]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 5, pp. 81–91. – https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-5-81-91. (In Russ.).
  3. Belov, V. N. (2018) [The Method of Infinitesimals as a Principle of the Theory of Knowledge in the Systematic Constructions of G. Cohen]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 3, pp. 68–74. (In Russ.).
  4. Belov, V. N. (2002) Neokantianstvo [Neo-Kantianism]. Part 2. Paul Natorp. Saratov, 108 p.
  5. Belov, V. N. (2018) [The Concept of Religion in the System of Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy]. Judaica Petropolitana [Judaica Petropolitana]. Vol. 9, pp. 97–102. (In Russ.).
  6. Belov, V. N. (2024) [Hermann Cohen’s Psychology]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 6, pp. 124–134. – https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-124-134. (In Russ.).
  7. Belov, V. N. (2014) [Reception of Cohen’s Ethics in Russia]. Kantovsky sbornik [Kantian journal]. Vol. 4 (50), pp. 98–110. (In Russ.).
  8. Belov, V. N. (2006) [Hermann Cohen’s System of Critical Idealism]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 4, pp. 144–150. (In Russ.).
  9. Belov, V. N. (2016) [Modern Researches of Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 6, pp. 218–222. (In Russ.).
  10. Belov, V. N. (2010) [Hermann Cohen’s Teaching in Russia: Peculiarities of Reception]. Neokantianstvo nemetskoye i russkoye: mezhdu teoriyey poznaniya i kritikoy kul’tury [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Knowledge and Critique of Culture]. M.: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), pp. 299–317. (In Russ.).
  11. Belov, V. N. (2008) [Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Culture]. Kantovsky sbornik [Kantian journal]. Vol. 1 (27), pp. 74–81. (In Russ.).
  12. Belov, V. N. (2020) [Cohen’s and Natorp’s Philosophy of Religion: The Debate on the Limits of Reason]. Kantovsky sbornik [Kantian journal]. Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 54–71. – https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2020-3-3. (In Russ.).
  13. Belov, V. N. (2021) Filosofskaya sistema Germana Kogena [Hermann Cohen’s Philosophical System]. Moscow: LENAND, 256 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Belov, V. N. (2003) [Ernst Cassirer. Philosophy of Symbolic Forms]. Vol. 1. Language. 272 p. Vol. 2. Mythological Thinking. 280 p. Vol. 3. Phenomenology of Cognition. 398 p. Moscow, St. Petersburg: University Book. 2002. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 12, pp. 177–182. (In Russ., transl. from German).
  15. Belov, V. N. (2014) [Ethics in the System of Philosophical Criticism of Hermann Cohen]. Eticheskaya mysl [Ethical Thought]. Vol. 14, pp. 174–199. (In Russ.).
  16. Belov, V. N. (2015) [Is Hermann Cohen a Neo-Kantian?]. Kantovsky sbornik [Kantian journal]. Vol. 3 (53), pp. 38–45. – https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-3. (In Russ.).
  17. Belov, V. N. (2021) [Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion and Western Christianity]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orthodox St. Tikhon’s University for the Humanities]. Series 1: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies. Vol. 94, pp. 23–36. – https://doi.org/10.15382/sturI202194.23-36. (In Russ.).
  18. Windelband, W. (1995) [Plato]. Vil’gel’m Vindel’band Izbrannoye: Dukh i istoriya [Wilhelm Windelband Selected: Spirit and History]. Moscow: Jurist, pp. 365. (In Russ.).
  19. Windelband, W. (1997) Istoriya filosofii [History of Philosophy]. Kyiv, 553 p.
  20. Windelband, W. (1995) [Preludes]. Vil’gel’m Vindel’band Izbrannoye: Dukh i istoriya [Wilhelm Windelband Selected: Spirit and History]. M.: Jurist, pp. 21. (In Russ.).
  21. Windelband, V. (1995) [Philosophy in the German Spiritual Life of the 19th Century]. Vil’gel’m Vindel’band Izbrannoye: Dukh i istoriya [Wilhelm Windelband Selected Works: Spirit and History]. M.: Jurist, pp. 295. (In Russ.).
  22. Windelband, V. (1995) [What is Philosophy? (On the Concept and History of Philosophy)]. Vil’gel’m. Vindel’band Izbrannoye: Dukh i istoriya [Wilhelm Windelband Selected Works: Spirit and History]. M.: Jurist, pp. 22–58. (In Russ.).
  23. Gaidenko, P. P. (1978) [The Principle of Universal Mediation in the Neo-Kantianism of the Marburg School]. Kant i kantiantsy [Kant and the Kantians]. M.: Science, 359 p. (In Russ.).
  24. Dmitrieva, N. A. (2010) [Neo-Kantianism and Leo Tolstoy: from «science-based learning» to the doctrine of man]. Neokantianstvo nemetskoye i russkoye: mezhdu teoriyey poznaniya i kritikoy kul’tury [German and Russian Neo- Kantianism: between the theory of knowledge and the criticism of culture]. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), pp. 379–400. (In Russ.).
  25. Dmitrieva, N. A. (2007) Neokantianstvo nemetskoye i russkoye: mezhdu teoriyey poznaniya i kritikoy kul’tury [Russian Neo-Kantianism: «Marburg» in Russia. Historical and philosophical essays]. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 512 p.
  26. Zhuchkov, V. A. (1978) [Kant’s System and Its Transformation in Neo-Kantianism]. Kant i kantiantsy [Kant and the Kantians]. M. : Science, pp. 24. (In Russ.).
  27. Cohen, G. (2012) Teoriya opyta Kanta [Kant’s Theory of Experience]. M. : Academicheskii Proekt, 618 p. (In Russ., transl. from German).
  28. Krainen, K., Belov, V. N. (2008) [Studying Neo-Kantianism: Reading Instructions]. Kantovsky sbornik [Kantian journal] .Vol. 2 (28), pp. 66–73. (In Russ.).
  29. Natorp, P. (2006) [Kant and the Marburg School]. Paul’ Natorp Izbrannyye raboty [Paul Natorp Selected Works]. M., pp. 119–144. (In Russ.).
  30. Poma, A. (2012) Kriticheskaya filosofiya Germana Kogena [Hermann Cohen’s Critical Philosophy]. M.: Academicheskii Proekt, 319 p. (In Russ., transl. from Italian).
  31. Semenov, V. E. (2023) [Kant and the Marburg School]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 541– 555. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-3-541-555. (In Russ.).
  32. Sokuler, Z. A. (2021) [Hermann Cohen and his idea of the logic of pure knowledge]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 378–393. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-378-393. (In Russ.).
  33. Sokuler, Z. A. (2008) German Kogen i filosofiya dialoga [Hermann Cohen and the philosophy of dialogue]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 312 p.
  34. Sokuler, Z. A. (2019) [The concept of virtue in the religious philosophy of Hermann Cohen]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 398–412. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-4-398-412. (In Eng.).
  35. Chernov, S. A. (2004) [Kantians against Jacobi]. Credo new [Credo new].Vol. 4, pp. 1. (In Russ.).
  36. Chernov, S. A. (2023) [Friedrich Jacobi: Only a Madman Can Be a Follower of Kant!]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 513–526. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-3-513-526. (In Russ.).
  37. Edel, G. (2010) [Neo-Kantianism Today: Unresolved Issues]. Neokantianstvo nemetskoye i russkoye: mezhdu teoriyey poznaniya i kritikoy kul’tury [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Knowledge and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), pp. 532–540. (In Russ.).
  38. Beiser, Frederick C. (2014) The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism: 1796–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 6–8. (In Eng.).
  39. Belov, V. (2013) Der Begriff der Geschichte bei Hermann Cohen und Matvej Kagan. Der Begriff der Geschichte im Marburger und südwestdeutschen Neukantianismus. Hrsg. von Ch. Krijnen und M. de Launay. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 159–171. (In Eng.).
  40. Bertolino, L., Belov, V. N. (2020) Jewishness in Philosophy. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 321–327. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-3-321-327. (In Eng.).
  41. Boch, M. (2024) Transzendentalphilosophie und Post-Neukantianismus. Zur Kontinuität der Problemgeschichte der Transzendentalen Systematik im 20. Jahrhundert RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 28. No. 3, pp. 697–716. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-697-716. (In Eng.).
  42. Dober, H. M. (2021) Consciousness with Body and Soul: An Attempt at Cohen’s Never-Written Psychology. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 25. No. 3, pp. 420–435. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-420-435. (In Eng.).
  43. Dvorkin, I. (2021) Bakhtin and Cohen: The First Stages in Building the Philosophical System. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 25. No. 3, pp. 436–456. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-436-456. (In Eng.).
  44. Edel, G. (2024) Wolfgang Marx als Post-Neukantianer: Die Reflexion der Reflexion der Reflexion. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 28. No. 3, pp. 717–725. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-717-725. (In Eng.).
  45. Gamba, E. (2019) The Problem of Individuality in Hermann Cohen’s Aesthetics. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 23. No. 4, pp. 413–419. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-4-413-419.
  46. Gamba, E. (2021) The Artistic Representation of Jesus in Hermann Cohen’s Aesthetics. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 25. No. 3, pp. 404–419. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-404-419. (In Eng.).
  47. Holzhey, H. (1986) Cohen und Natorp. Bd. 1: Ursprung und Einheit. Die Geschichte der „Marburger Schule” als Auseinandersetzung um die Logik des Denkens. Bd. 2: Der Marburger Neukantianismus in Quellen. Zeugnisse kritischer Lektüre -Briefe der Marburger -Dokumente zur Philosophiepolitik der Schule. Basel: S chwabe. ( In German).
  48. Krijnen, Ch. (2024) Post-Neo-Kantian Idealism. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 28. No. 3, pp. 653– 669. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-653-669. (In Eng.).
  49. Kuhn, M. (2010) Interpreting Kant Correctly: On the Kant of the Neo-Kantians. Makkreel, Rudolph and Luft, Sebastian, «Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy» (2010). Books by Marquette University Faculty, pp. 126. (In Eng.).
  50. Noras, A. Ja. (2020) Post-Neo-Kantianism. What is this? RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 24. No. 1, pp. 89– 98. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-1-89-98. (In Eng.).
  51. Poma, A. (2017) Cadenzas. Philosophical Notes for Postmodernism. Cham : Springer, 244 p.
  52. Poma, A., Belov, V. N. (2021) Is Hermann Cohen a Classical Philosopher? RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 25. No. 3, pp. 371–377. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-371-377. (In Eng.).
  53. Stolzenberg, J. (1995) Ursprung und System. Probleme der Begründung systematischer Philosophie im Werk Hermann Cohens, Paul Natorps und beim frühen Martin Heidegger. Göttingen. (In German).
  54. Vladimir Belov (2016) Hermann Cohens Lehre in Russland: Besonderheiten der Rezeption. Folia Philosophica. Vol. 35. Katowice, pp. 9–27. (In Eng.).
  55. Vladimir Belov (2022) Hermann Cohen in Russian Philosophy of Law. Neo-Kantianism and Cultural Sciences. Edited by Giovanni Morrone and Roberto Redaelli. Napoli : FedOAPress, pp. 319–349. (In Eng.).
  56. Vladimir N. Belov (2016) Hermann Cohen in the History of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Russian Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 54, No.5, pp. 395–407. (In Eng.).
  57. Wiedebach, H. (2021) Guarding Thought against Self-Destruction. Contradiction and Identity in Cohen and Hegel. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 25. No. 3, pp. 394–403. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-394-403. (In Eng.).
  58. Wiedebach, H. (2022) Hermann Cohen, Martin Buber, Franz Rosenzweig on Torah: Jewish Teaching versus Law. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 26. No. 3, pp. 523–536. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-3-523-536. (In Eng.).
  59. Zeidler, K. W. (1995) Kritische Dialektik und Transzendentalontologie. Der Ausgang des Neukantianismus und die post-neukantianische Systematik. Bonn, 372 p. (In German).
  60. Zeidler, K. W. (2024) Der Post-Neukantianismus und das Problem einer Wiederbelebung der Systematischen Transzendentalphilosophie. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 28. No. 3, pp. 635–652. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-635-652. (In German).