N.N. Ravochkin
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate professor of humanitarian and legal disciplines, Kemerovo state agricultural institute
LINGUISTIC TURN: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL POTENTIAL
The article analyzes social and philosophical potential of linguistic turn that took place in the 20th century and is one of authoritative foundations for multitude of philosophical foundations of the present forming non-classical rationality. To avoid possible difficulties, the author draws a boundary between the subject areas of linguistics and linguistic philosophy (philosophy of language). Two stages of linguistic turn are considered. It`s determined that the «first meaning» of this phenomenon finds its development in various philosophical concepts. Social and philosophical potential of the linguistic turn is considered mainly through the Wittgenstein language games. Catching the modern trend of addressing the applied meaning of scientific research, the author determines the overall potential of the linguistic turn, related to the possibilities of addressing real life practices and interaction between a multitude of actors in society. In addition to general potential there is also a special one which is associated with political and legal spheres of public life research.
Keywords: linguistic turn, language, language games, linguistics, society, law, politics, power, social environment.
References
1. Vasiliev, V.A. The linguistic turning-point in philosophy / V.A. Vasiliev // Moscow State Linguistic University Bulletin. – 2017. – Vol. 1. – pp. 172-181.
2. Volkov, A.V. Linguistic turn in the XX century philosophy and the methodology of social sciences and humanities / A.V. Volkov // Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University. – 2008. – Vol. 1 (91). – pp. 92-99.
3. Gavrilina, L.M. The Epoch of Turns: Epistemological Searches and Sociocultural Realities / L.M. Gavrilina // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. – 2015. – Issue 1. – Vol. 2. – pp. 31-36.
4. Didikin, A.B., Ogleznev, V.V. Ontology and epistemology of law: analytical tradition: monograph. – Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2012. – 200 p.
5. Kildyashov, M.A. Linguistic comprehension of the theory of intertextuality / M.A. Kildyashov // Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – pp. 137-141.
6. Korshunova, A.V. Verbal play: the linguistic turn in philosophy / A.V. Korshunova // Bulletin of the Buryat State University. – 2008. – Vol. 10. – pp. 71-75.
7. Kutyreva, I.V. The problem of understanding language in philosophy: linguistic turn / I.V. Kutyreva // Language and world of the language. – 2015. – Vol. 6 (6). – pp. 218-221.
8. Ladov, V.A. Ontological problems in analytical philosophy / V.A. Ladov // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. – 2010. – Vol. 1 (23). – pp. 84-97.
9. Ladov, V.A. Semantics and Ontology: The Problem of Reality in Analytical Philosophy. – Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press, 2010. – 134 p.
10. Ladov, V.A. Formal realism. – Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press, 2011. – 132 p.
11. Lebedev, M.V., Chernyak, A.Z. Analytical philosophy. – Moscow: RUDN University, 2004. – 740 p.
12. Ogleznev, V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Hart`s analytical legal philosophy and legal realism / V.V. Ogleznev V.A. Surovtsev // Proceedings of higher education institutions. Legal science. – 2013. – Vol. 4 (309). – pp. 134-147.
13. Ogleznev, V.V. Descriptive and ascriptive approaches to the elucidation of action / V.V. Ogleznev // Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. – 2016. – Issue 10. – Vol. 2. – pp. 471-482.
14. Ogleznev, V.V. Theory of legal language in G. Hart`s philosophy of law / author’s abstract of diss…..Doctor of Philosophical sciences: 09.00.03. – Tomsk State University. – Tomsk, 2012. – 257 p.
15. Sidorova, L.P., Shnyreva, O.E. Linguistic aspect of establishment of neoclassic rationality / L.P. Sidorova, O.E. Shnyreva // Simbirsk Scientific Bulletin. – 2014. – Vol. 2 (16). – pp. 150-155.
16. Fazylova, E.R. Linguistic turn and its role in European consciousness transformation in XX century / E.R. Fazylova // Omsk Scientific Bulletin. – 2007. – Vol. 5 (59). – pp. 117-121.
17. Khalina, N.V. Preface to the second wave of the linguistic turn: Foulkner's measure of events and persons / N.V. Khalina // Proceedings of Altai State University Journal. – 2006. – Vol. 4. – pp. 115-119.
18. Chistanov, M.N. Linguistic turn as reflection of the crisis in ontology / M.N. Chistanov // Philosophy of Science. – 2008. – Vol. 2 (37). – pp. 33-43.
19. Shushkina, A.G. Critical theory of society today / A.G. Shushkina // Humanities Research in the Russian Far East. – 2014. – Vol. 2 (28). – pp. 98-103.
20. Humboldt, W. von. On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. – Cambridge University Press, 1988. – 296 p.
21. Lucy, J.A. Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis / International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 2015. – pp. 903-906.