Doctor of Economic Sciences, Chief Researcher, Institute of Market Problems, Russian Academy of Science

Relevance. Realization of policy of import substitution has allowed a number of the countries of Southeast Asia and China to provide not only high rates of economic growth, but also to receive the updated advanced industry. The international competitiveness of goods from the countries of Southeast Asia and China confirms fidelity of the chosen direction. However during realization of policy of import substitution in Russia there were most powerful technological changes which have generated digital technologies and the Internet of things. It has turned out that when updating industry the factor of work loses the importance in production function as robotization is more preferable in connection with more high efficiency, than creation of new jobs. 

Scope. To consider possible mechanisms of leveling of negative consequences of robotization and digitalization in the form of refusal of a work factor in favor of a capital factor.

Methods. When carrying out a research general scientific and special methods and tools of an economic research were used: set of scientific receptions of an abstract and logical method, method of the institutional analysis.

Results of a research. In article the mechanism of refusal of the capital of a work factor, possible consequences and ways of leveling of negative consequences of robotization and digitalization is discussed.

Keywords: import substitution, digitalization, capital, labor, unconditional income, induced incorporating

References

1. List, F. National system of political economy. – Moscow: Publishing House «Europe», 2005. – 382 p.

2. Loginov, E.L., Derkach, N.L. Problems of formation of the convergent sphere of globally interconnected and synchronized intellectual administrative spaces // National interests: priorities and security. – 2011. – Vol. 9. – pp. 33-37.

3. Loginov, E.L., Loginova, V.E., Derkach, N.L. Convergent technological clusters as the environment of innovative operations in the conditions of globalization // Economics: theory and practice. – 2012. – Vol. 1 (25). – pp. 3-7.

4. Loginov, E.L., Pinchuk, V.N. Problems of formation of a cross-border information environment for managing the economy on the basis of convergence-informational factors // Financial analytics: problems and solutions. – 2011. – Vol. 44. – pp. 7-13.

5. Osipov, V.S. The role of import substitution in the formation of a new development model // Intelligence. Innovation. Investments. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – pp. 24-31.

6. Reinert, E.S. Spontaneous chaos. Economy of the Recession. – Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2017. – pp. 11-12.

7. Timofeev, D.N, Tsypin, A.P. Industrial production in Russia: the state and development prospects // Economics and Entrepreneurship. – 2016. – Vol. 3-2 (68-2). – pp. 1146-1152.

8. Tsypin, A.P, Sorokin, A.S. Statistical packages of programs in socio-economic research // Azimuth of scientific research: economics and management. – 2016. – Issue 5. – Vol. 4 (17). – pp. 379-384.

9. Bregman, R. Utopian thinking: the easy way to eradicate poverty // The Guardian, 2017.

10. Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerization? // Working Paper. Oxford Martin School, 2013.

11. Hirschman, A.O. The political economy of import-substituting industrialization in Latin America // Quarterly Journal of Economics. February, 1968.

12. Jaimovich, N., Siu, H.E. The Trend is the Cycle: Job Polarization and Jobless Recoveries // Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012.

13. Onimode, B. Imperialism and Underdevelopment in Nigeria. The Dialectics of Mass Poverty. – L., 1982. – p. 177.

14. Standing, G. How Cash Transfers Promote the Case for Basic Income // Basic Income Studies. – 2008. – Vol. 3. – Issue 1.

15. Usman, W.Ch. Universal Basic Income: A Review // Social Science Research Network, 2017.