Candidate of Economic Sciences, Аssistant Professor at the Department of geodesy and land management, Far Eastern State Agrarian University

The relevance of the research problem due to the fact that its decision influences as a whole the comfort of living and quality of life of the population, as the projects of integrated development have obvious advantages over objects created by point, as a unified concept and architectural style of all buildings erected, etc. the Purpose of this article is to identify trends in land administration in the sphere of housing construction as part of state land and urban planning policy. 

The methodological basis of the work was general scientific principles and research methods: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. The integrated approach also used methods of observation and comparison.

As the main results achieved in the course of the study, we can highlight: the identification of the main directions of development of urban areas; analysis of point development and integrated development of the territory for the construction of standard housing; analysis of the cost of complex residential development; opening the most significant problems of implementation of complex residential development of the territory. The results of the scientific article will be useful for researchers in the field of urban planning, as well as specialists of construction organizations engaged in the construction of territories.

Keywords: urban area, housing construction, land resources, engineering and social infrastructure, complex development of territories, rational use, point construction

References

1. Architecture. Construction. Engineering systems: monograph / E.Y. Ageeva, L.L. Babenko, T.V. Bondarenko, S.V. Borisov and others – Novosibirsk: Publishing house NSTU, 2012. – 466 p. 

2. Baulina, O.A. Problems and prospects of housing construction in modern Russia [Electronic resource] / O.A. Baulina, V.V. Klyushin. – Access: http:// naukovedenie.ru / PDF / 15EVN216.pdf – (reference date: 04.06.2018).

3. Buzyrev, V.V. The efficiency of the infrastructure of housing in entrepreneurial activity of business entities / V.V. Buzyrev, M.N. Udenko// Economics of construction. – 2014. – Vol. 6. – pp. 32-37.

4. Virzev, M.Y. Development of areas through development of low–rise housing / M.Y. Virzev// Journal of Russian entrepreneurship. – 2014. – Vol. 18. – pp. 100-108. 

5. Gerbeev, L.Y. The role and place of ownership in the development of the region / L.Y. Gerbeau //Economics and entrepreneurship. – 2014. – Vol. 11. – pp. 120-125.

6. Zagoskin, N.N. The main directions of development of investment and construction activities in Russia / N.N. Zaguskin // Economic revival of Russia. –2012. – Vol. 4. – pp. 135-141.

7. Kabakova, S.I. Ways to improve urban policy in the Russian Federation / S.I. Kabakova // Construction Economics. – 2012. – Vol. 6. – pp. 3-9.

8. Kuzmich, N.P. Expand the resource base of the construction complex on the basis of the use of local raw materials and energy system technique technologies / N.P. Kuzmich // Problems of modern economy. – 2012. – Vol. 2. – pp. 325-328.

9. Kuzmich, N.P. The role of the construction complex in socially–oriented directions of development of the region / N.P. Kuzmich // Labor and social relations. – 2011. – Vol. 7. – pp. 52-55.

10. Sarchenko, V.I. The Development of urban areas requires a scientific study / V.I. Sarchenko //  Economics of construction. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – pp. 65-68.