UDC: 141.1 (141.12)
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-5-133


viewing

ON THE METAPHYSICAL FOUNDATIONS OF NATURALISM IN RELATION TO CONSCIOUSNESS

E. V. Uskova
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia
e-mail: uskova80@mail.ru

Abstract. The article examines the ontological foundations of naturalism in relation to consciousness and attempts to clarify the relationship between naturalism and metaphysics. Ontology is understood as the doctrine of being, and metaphysics as research beyond empirical foundations. Is it possible to «naturalize» metaphysics and include consciousness in the ontological picture of the world in a way that would correspond to scientific standards? That is the question. Naturalism is the most natural and widespread, but not without contradictions, philosophical position. It proceeds from the priority of scientific knowledge, while the criteria of scientificity often turn out to be vague; proclaims reduction as the main principle, adherence to which can deprive the subject of research of its specificity; often denies the significance of ontological foundations in solving epistemological issues. Naturalism in relation to consciousness has a number of obvious advantages: reliance on science and explanation of consciousness only as a natural phenomenon; application of strict scientific methods in the study of consciousness; consideration of the brain as the source and cause of consciousness. The following difficulties encountered by naturalistic theories of consciousness are noted: the problem of «qualia» and phenomenal aspects of conscious experience; failure to explain «consciousness-body» (consciousness-brain); the problem of localization of consciousness; the unity of the «I» as a bearer of consciousness; the ontological status of consciousness. The question of the status of philosophy in the naturalistic study of the world as a whole and consciousness as a part of it is also raised. Philosophy claims to be a translator from one language to another and tries to build a unified picture of the world, alternately using physics, logic, and biology as basic terms. The metaphysical claims of philosophy are considered ontological and epistemological realism, while the opposite position is relativism or pluralism. Naturalism as applied to theories of consciousness is understood as a research position free from metaphysics.

Key words: philosophy of consciousness, metaphysics of consciousness, ontological status of consciousness, naturalism, physicalism, reductionism.

Cite as: Uskova, E. V. (2025) [On the metaphysical foundations of naturalism in relation to consciousness]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 5, pp. 133–141. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-5-133.


References

  1. Zolotkov, G. A. (2018) [On the return to metaphysics in analytical philosophy of consciousness]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences]. Vol. 10, pp. 130–142. – https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-10-130-142. (In Russ.).
  2. Ivanov, D. (2018) [Philosophy of consciousness]. Filosofskaya antropologiya [Philosophical anthropology]. Vol. 4, pp. 218–250. – https://doi.org/10/21146/2414-3715-2018-4-2-218-250. (In Russ.).
  3. Serl, D. (2002) Otkryvaya soznanie zanovo [Rediscovering consciousness]. Moscow: Idea-Press, 256 p.
  4. [The Transcendental Turn in Contemporary Philosophy (9): Metaphysics, Epistemology, Theory of Consciousness, Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Theology]. sbornik tezisov 9-go mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara «Transtsendental’nyy povorot v sovremennoy filosofii» [Collection of Abstracts of the 9th International Scientific Seminar «The Transcendental Turn in Contemporary Philosophy»]. Ed. S. L. Katrechko, A. A. Shiyan; Publisher: RGGU, 162 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Chalmers, D. (2013) Soznayushchij um: v poiskah fundamental’noj teorii [The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory]. Moscow: URSS: LIBROKOM, 512 p.
  6. Yulina, N. S. (2012) [Antithesis of naturalism and formalism. yesterday and today]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences]. Vol. 4, p. 116–130. (In Russ.).
  7. Yulina, N. S. (2012) Problema metafiziki v amerikanskoj filosofii XX veka. Kriticheskij ocherk empiriko-pozitivistskih techenij [The Problem of Metaphysics in American Philosophy of the Twentieth Century. A Critical Essay on Empirical-Positivist Currents]. Moscow: Science, 295 p.
  8. Yulina, N. S. (2007) Filosofskij naturalizm: o knige Deniela Denneta «Svoboda evolyucioniruet”» [Philosophical Naturalism: On Daniel Dennett’s «Freedom Evolves»]. Moscow, Kanon+, 240 p.
  9. Brandl, J. (2007) The Unmysteriousness of Consciousness: A Case Study in Naturalistic Philosophy. How Successful is Naturalism?. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 243–266. (In Eng.).
  10. Crane, T. (2018) A Short History of the Philosophy of Consciousness in the Twentieth Century. Kind A. Philosophy of Mind in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, Vol. 6, pp. 78–103. (In Eng.).
  11. Gasser, G. & Stefan, M. (2007) The Heavy Burden of Proof for Ontological Naturalism. In How Successful is Naturalism? Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 159–182. (In Eng.).
  12. Hacker, P. M. S. (2007) Passing by the Naturalistic Turn: On Quine’s Cul-De-Sac In How Successful is Naturalism? Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 143–158. (In Eng.).
  13. Papineau, David «Naturalism». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/naturalism/. (accessed: 15.02.2025). (In Eng.).
  14. Place, U. T. (1956) Is Consciousness a Brain Process? British Journal of Psychology. Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 44–50. (In Eng.).
  15. Quine, W. V. O. (1981) Things and their Place in Theories. Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 216 p. (In Eng.).
  16. Rea, M. C. (2007) How Successful Is Naturalism? Gasser G. How Successful is Naturalism? Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 105–116. (In Eng.).
  17. Sellars, R. W. (1924) The Emergence of Naturalism. The International Journal of Ethics, Vol. XXXIV. No. 4, pp. 309–338. (In Eng.).
  18. Smart, J. J. C. (1959) Sensations and Brain Processes. Philosophical Review. Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 141–156. (In Eng.).