UDC: 165.6/.8
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-3-130
EDN: YTJXJC


viewing

CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS OF REFLECTION THEORY

E. N. Gnatik1, V. M. Naidysh2
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russia
1 e-mail: gnatik-en@rudn.ru
2 e-mail: v.naidysh@bk.ru

Abstract. In connection with the rapid development of cognitive sciences in epistemology, philosophy of consciousness, realistic concepts of cognition are actualized, and with them, interest in the theory of reflection, its current state, is growing again. The article analyzes the main paradigms of the theory of reflection, the paths of their historical development and its current problems. The importance of the transition from the subject-centric to the system-centric paradigm of understanding reflection is emphasized, in which it appears as a complex systemic process, the activity of which is predetermined by the structure and history of the reflecting system. It is noted that in biological evolution, the activity of reflection developed in the direction of increasing the subject’s control over the process of reflection itself, improving the ability to separate objective and subjective moments of reflection. On this path, two relatively independent subsystems of mental reality were formed – the image of the external environment and the image of the internal states of the subject’s psyche. With the help of memory, the image of the external environment was accumulated in external experience, which serves as the basis of cognitive reality. The image of internal states accumulated in internal experience, which is the basis of semantic reality, expressed by the sensory-emotional states of the subject, closely related to the need-motivational sphere of the psyche. In the light of the system-centric methodology, consciousness appears as an integral quality of the functional activity of the brain, emergent in relation to such activity.

Based on the system-centric methodology, the issues of synthesis of the principles of reflection and activity are analyzed, the content of the concept of the fundamental relationship of consciousness is revealed, the concept of semantic reality, the dialectic of cognitive and semantic functionals in the activity of consciousness are analyzed. It is emphasized that the semantic functionality of consciousness is formed on the basis of the needs, interests, goals of the subject and is able to manifest the personal context of consciousness, the subjective side of human life. The article shows that modern problems and dead ends of cognitive psychology are precisely associated with ignoring the patterns of the relationship between cognitive and semantic functionals in the activity of consciousness.

Key words: reflection, activity, knowledge, meaning, consciousness, values, cognitive psychology.

Cite as: Gnatik, E. N., Naidysh, V. M. (2025) [Contemporary problems of reflection theory]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 3, pp. 130–140. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-3-130.


References

  1. Anokhin, P. K. (1978) Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funkcional’noj sistemy. [Selected works. Philosophical aspects of the theory of functional systems]. Moscow: Science Publ., 400 p.
  2. Vuketich, F. (2012) Evolyuciya i poznanie. Paradigmy, perspektivy, problem [Evolution and knowledge. Paradigms, prospects, problems]. Evolyucionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya [Evolutionary epistemology. Anthology]. Moscow, St.Petersburg: Center of scientific initiatives Publ., pр. 275–314. (In Russ.).
  3. Didro, D. (1986) Razgovor D’Alambera i Didro [Conversation between D’Alembert and Diderot]. Vol. 1, Moscow: Thought Publ., 592 p.
  4. Leontiev, A. N. (1975) Deyatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 303 p.
  5. Leontiev, A. N. (1966) [The concept of reflection and its significance for psychology]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 12. pp. 48–56. (In Russ.).
  6. Lomov, B. F. (1984) Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problem psihologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow: Science Publ., 445 p.
  7. Lorenz, K. (1998) Oborotnaya storona zerkala [The Other Side of the Mirror]. Moscow: Republic Publ., 393 p.
  8. Marks, K. (1960) [Capital]. K. Marks i F. Engel’s. Sochineniya. T. 23. [K. Marx and F. Engels. Works. Vol. 23]. Vol. 1. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature, 907 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Neisser, U. (1981) Poznanieireal’nost’. Smysl i principy kognitivnoj psihologii [Cognition and Reality. The Meaning and Principles of Cognitive Psychology]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 230 p.
  10. Khomskaya, E. D. (1986) Nejropsihologicheskij analiz mezhpolusharnoj asimmetrii mozga [Neuropsychological analysis of interhemispheric asymmetry of the brain]. Moscow: Science Publ., 205 p.
  11. Petrovsky, V. A. (1985) [The principle of reflected subjectivity in psychological research of personality]. Voprosy Psihologii [Questions of Psychology]. Vol. 4, pp. 17–31. (In Russ.).
  12. Piaget, J. (1969) Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. Psihologiya intellekta. Genezischisla u rebenka. Logika i psihologiya [Selected psychological works. Psychology of intelligence. Genesis of number in a child. Logic and psychology]. Moscow: Education Publ., 659 p.
  13. «Realistic turn» in Contemporary Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Science?] (2017) Materials of «Round Table». Participants: V. A. Lektorsky, B. I. Pruzhinin, E. L. Chertkova, D. I. Dubrovsky, D. V. Ivanov, A. S. Karpenko, E. A. Mamchur, S. V. Pirozhkova, A. V. Rodin, N. M. Smirnova, E. O. Trufanova. / V. A. Lektorsky [et al.] Voprosy Filosofii. [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 1, pp. 5–38. (In Russ.).
  14. Rubinstein, S. L. (1957) Bytie i soznanie [Being and consciousness]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 328 p.
  15. Rubinstein, S. L. (2003) Osnovy obshchej psihologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 713 p.
  16. Solso, R. L. (2006) Kognitivnaya psihologiya [Cognitive Psychology]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 589 p.
  17. Frank, S. L. (1997) Real’nost’ i chelovek [Reality and Man]. Moscow: Republic Publ., 479 p.
  18. Baars, B. J. (1986) The cognitive revolution in psychology. N.Y.: Guilford Publ., 443 р. (In Eng.).
  19. Neisser, U. (1967) Cognitive Psychology. N.Y.: Appleton–Century-Crofts, 378 p. (In Eng.).
  20. Smolin, L. (1997). The Life of the Cosmos. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 349 p. (In Eng.).