UDC: 101.1:316.77 (045)
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-3-115


viewing

ON THE ISSUE OF POLYSUBJECTIVITY OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY IN RELATIONS OF SPIRITUAL PROPERTY

I. A. Latypov
Udmurt State University, Izhevsk, Russia
e-mail: ildarlatypov@mail.ru

F. N. Ponosov
Udmurt State Agricultural University, Izhevsk, Russia
e-mail: peshta@bk.ru

Abstract. The relevance of this research is determined by the demand of the analysis of the multiplicity of subjects as sources and carriers of activity in intellectual activity for various purposes (for example, in culture, art, information production, mass communications, etc.). On the other hand, the problems of inter-confessional conflicts and the promotion of spiritual values by various confessions are acute. Also, various issues related to the revival of religiosity are important for Russian atheists, Muslims, Orthodox and other confessions.

The aim of the work is to study complex issues of poly-subjectivity in intellectual activity in modern processes of preservation and development of spiritual property.

Scientific induction, N. Luhmann’s social differentiation and the concept of poly-subject sociality of the Ural Philosophical School are used as methodological bases.

The main results of the study include a shift in the priorities of socio-philosophical research of intellectual activity in the relations of spiritual property from the predominant analysis of dialogues to the analysis of poli-logues, from paired forms of cooperation to simultaneous and multiple cooperation of many subjects with socio-cultural communities and systems of spiritual property.

The scientific novelty includes estimates of the local elimination of contradiction of «individual» and «social» in large poly-subject networks of intellectual activity (for example, in the national project for the development of the digital economy). Indeed, the overall possible intensity of intellectual activity of interconnected mono-subjects in the limit transition grows proportionally to the second degree of their number (i.e. a poly-subject network becomes a societal network).

The directions of further research are determined by the prospects and problems of analyzing the impending breakthrough in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and the problems of subjectivity of both these developments and the results of AI activities.

Further refinement and development of the poly-subject chronotopic concept of analyzing subjectivity in intellectual activity in relations of spiritual property is recommended for diachronic and synchronous study of their role in social space and social time.

Key words: poly-subjectivity, secularization, faith, atheism, intellectual activity, spiritual (non-material) property.

Cite as: Latypov, I. A., Ponosov, F. N. (2024) [On the issue of polysubjectivity of intellectual activity in relations of spiritual property]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 3, pp. 115–126. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-3-115.


References

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1994) Pole intellektual’noy deyatel’nosti kak osobyy mir [The field of intellectual activity as a special world]. Available at: http://bourdieu.name/content/pole-intellektualnoj-dejatelnosti-kak-osobyj-mir (accessed: 19.09.2023). (In Russ.).
  2. Hegel, G. V. F. (1990) Filosofya prava [The philosophy of law]. Moscow: Mysl’, 524 p.
  3. Golovin, N. A. (2021) [N. Luman’s notion of social conflict: toward an extension of research on the communicative field]. Kommunikacii. Media. Dizajn [Communications. Media. Design]. Vol. 6, № 1, pp. 5–21. – EDN: UICXGV. (In Russ.).
  4. Isupov, K. G. (1993) [The spirit of property and the property of the spirit]. Russkaya filosofiya sobstvennosti XVIII–XX vv. [The Russian Philosophy of Property of the XVIII–XX centuries]. K. G. Isupov, I. Savkin (Ed), St. Petersburg: SP «Ganza», pp. 452–466. (In Russ.).
  5. Kemerov, V. E. (2014) [Keys to the present – in shifts of methodology]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. Vol. 2, pp. 3–13. – EDN: QDNXXH.. (In Russ.).
  6. Koreneva, A. Yu. (2021) [Philosophical aspects of the formation of PR thinking and the peculiarities of teaching the discipline «Public Relations»]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Problems of modern education]. Vol. 4, pp. 30–42. – https://doi.org/10.31862/2218-8711-2021-4-30-42. – EDN: QOAMPT. (In Russ.).
  7. Latypov, I. A. (2022) [Social-philosophical aspects of copyright in conditions of digitalization]. Upravlenie intellektual’noj sobstvennost’yu v Udmurtskoj Respublike: Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, 25/X/2022 [Intellectual Property Management in the Udmurt Republic: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, 25/X/2022]. Izhevsk: Izhevsk: Udmurt State University Publ., pp. 6–12. – EDN: IGSTYU. (In Russ.).
  8. Latypov, I. A. (2007) [Social qualities of spiritual (non-matreial) property (philosophical aspects)]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 9. № 4 (39), pp. 224–232. – EDN: IJTGUR. (In Russ.).
  9. Latypov, I. A. (2018) [Philosophy of Spiritual (Non-Material) Property]. In: Reestr novyh nauchnyh napravlenij [The register of new scientific directions]. Vol. I. Moscow: «Akademiya Estestvoznaniya» Publ., pp. 98–99. – EDN: YWTBYD. (In Russ.).
  10. Luhman, N. (2005) Real’nost’ massmedia [The reality of mass media]. Moscow: Praksis, 256 p. – EDN: PWYQPR. (In Russ.).
  11. Lyubutin, К. N., Pivovarov, D. V. (1993) Dialektika sub”ekta i ob”ekta: monografiya [Dialectics of subject and object: monograph]. Ekaterinburg: Ural State University Publ., 416 p. – EDN: RWHUOT. (In Russ.).
  12. Molchanov, К. V. (2020) [The uncertainty of intelligence and artificial intelligence in the sciences and the target determination of intelligence and cyber intelligence in modern dialectics]. Filosofiya hozyajstva [The philosophy of the economy]. Vol. 2(128), pp. 201–219. – EDN: ZGTLAU. (In Russ.).
  13. Orekhov, А. М. (2019) [«Social Realism»: towards ontological foundations]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 21. № 3–4(103–104), pp. 169–175. – https://doi.org/10.30936/1606-951X-2019-21-3/4-169-175. – EDN: SEUBEY. (In Russ.).
  14. Ponosov, F. N. (2015) [Subjects of human cognition: structure and specifics of functioning]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 2, pp. 113–119. – EDN: TXKZVV. (In Russ.).
  15. Rezaev, A. V., Tregubova, N. D. (2018) [An Explorative Potential and Limits of N. Luhmann’s Systems Theory for Studying Interplay Online]. Kommunikacii. Media. Dizajn [Communications. Media. Design]. Vol. 3. № 4, pp. 5–21. –EDN: NCOMDI. (In Russ.).
  16. Samojlovskij, A. L. (2023) [Church: law, taxes, benefits]. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Oborona [Science. Society. Defense]. Vol. 11. № 1(34), pp. 10. – https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-1763-2023-1-10-10. – EDN: IQCNIV. (In Russ.).
  17. Campa, R. (2020) Social robots: a Bridge Between the Two Culture. Conference proceedings XXIII International Conference “Culture, Personality, Society in the Conditions of Digitalization: Methodology and Experience of Empirical Research” named after professor L.N. Kogan, 19-21 March. Yekaterinburg: Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Publ., pp. 669–680. – https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i2.8414. (In Eng.).
  18. Latour, B. (2005) [Reassembling the Social: an introduction to actor-network-theory]. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 301 p. (In Eng.).
  19. Latypov, I. А. (2008) Methodology of Social Differentiation of Informational Relations as a Philosophical Problem. Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social sciences. Vol. 3, pp. 347–353. (In Eng.).
  20. Latypov, I. A. (2020) The Role of Ethnic Non-Material Property for Intercultural Communications in Digital Society. Conference proceedings XXIII International Conference «Culture, Personality, Society in the Conditions of Digitalization: Methodology and Experience of Empirical Research» named after professor L.N. Kogan, 19-21 March, Yekaterinburg: Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Publ., pp. 350–357. – https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i2.8376.
  21. Merton, R. K. (2023) The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property. Available at: https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthewii.pdf (accessed: 17.09.2023). (In Eng.).
  22. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007). Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf (accessed: 17.09.2023). (In Eng.).