UDC: 130.2
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-2-93
EDN: UZQSDU


viewing

TRANSHUMANISM AND POSTHUMANISM: DEHUMANIZATION PLANS

V. G. Nedorezov1, L. Yu. Pisarchik2, Yu. Sh. Strelets3
Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia
1 e-mail: nvad@yandex.ru
2 e-mail: leonidtp@yandex.ru
3 e-mail: streletsyurii@mail.ru

Abstract. The article analyzes the ideas of transhumanism and posthumanism, which appeal to new discoveries in the field of biomedical, information, cognitive and nanotechnology (NBIC-convergent technologies) in order to declare the possibility of their application in the issue of human «improvement». The relevance of the study lies in the fact that human transgression is carried out in line with the analyzed lines of thought, which indicates their anti-humanistic nature. This requires study, reasoned criticism and an appeal to positive humanistic concepts as a counterweight to anti-humanism. In the mainstream of transhumanism, a person is understood not as a concept, but as a construct, as a certain set of properties and components with varying degrees of reliability and value. The human mind is considered the most valuable, while the biological organization of a person is defined as flawed, and therefore requires intervention and correction, and in the future, a person should generally give way to a posthuman. The article provides a reasoned criticism of these ideas. The purpose of the article is to identify both the positive and negative sides of transhumanism and posthumanism, as well as to criticize the methodological foundations of these areas of thought – technicism and reductionism. Posthumanism does not require setting the limits of the existence of human civilization, like transhumanism, but here a person is viewed from an anti-anthropocentric point of view, that is, as a being without value, and no different from everything that exists in the world. The article shows that such ideas contradict both ideas about the evolution of nature and ideas about society and the system of human values. It is unacceptable to dissolve a person in the world of things, plants and animals. This contradicts both the history of nature and the history of mankind. In this study, such research methods as the method of historical and philosophical analysis and the method of comparison are used. The novelty of the research consists in comparing the positions and basic ideas of transhumanism and posthumanism, which makes it possible to identify their continuity in the development of anti-humanistic attitudes and to give a reasoned criticism of these directions.

Key words: transhumanism, posthumanism, NBIC-convergent technologies, posthuman, dehumanization, technicism, reductionism.

Cite as: Nedorezov, V. G., Pisarchik, L. Yu., Strelets, Yu. Sh. (2024) [Transhumanism and posthumanism: dehumanization plans]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 1, pp. 93–108. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2024-2-93.


References

  1. Artyuhov, I. V. (2008) [Transhumanism: philosophical origins and history]. Novye tekhnologii i prodolzhenie evolyucii cheloveka? Transgumanisticheskij proekt budushchego [New technologies and the continuation of human evolution? Transhumanist project of the future]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, pp. 31–45.
  2. Arshinov, V. I., Budanov, V. G. (2016) [The paradigm of complexity and socio-humanitarian projections of convergent technologies]. Voprosy filosofii [Matters of Philosophy]. Vol. 1. Available at: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1332&ysclid=lr1r53lgbm787835633 (accessed: 06.12.2023). (In Russ.).
  3. Bostrom, N. (2002) Chto takoe trangumanizm [What is transhumanism]. Available at: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/6/93/#transhumanism (accessed: 19.12.2023) (In Russ., transl. from Engl.).
  4. Vindzh, V. (2019) Singulyarnost’: Sbornik. [Singularity: Collection]. Moscow: AST Publishing House, 224 p.
  5. Girenok, F. I. (2018) [Basic principles of digital philosophy]. Filosofiya hozyajstva [Philosophy of management]. Vol. 6 (120), pp. 133–139. – EDN: VXCLYI. (In Russ.).
  6. Grunval’d, A. (2015) [Ethics for nanotechnology]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of science and technology]. Vol. 20. No. 1, pp. 126–143. – EDN: UDZEBV. (In Russ.).
  7. Gusserl’, E. (2013) Idei k chistoj fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoj filosofii. Kniga pervaya. [Ideas for Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. The first book]. M.: Academic project, 489 p.
  8. Dreksler, K. E. (1986) Mashiny sozdaniya: Gryadushchaya era nanotekhnologij. [Machines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology]. Available at: https://royallib.com/read/dreksler_erik/mashini_sozdaniya.html#0 (accessed: 08.03.2023). (In Russ.).
  9. Ickov, D. I. (2014) [Social movement «Russia 2045» and the global future]. Global’noe budushchee 2045: Antropologicheskij krizis. Konvergentnye tekhnologii. Transgumanisticheskie proekty: Materialy Pervoj Vserossijskoj konferencii, Belgorod, 11–12 aprelya 2013 g. [Global Future 2045: Anthropological Crisis. Convergent technologies. Transhumanist projects: Materials of the First All-Russian Conference, Belgorod, April 11–12, 2013 / ed. D. I. Dubrovsky, S. M. Klimova]. Moscow: «Canon+» ROOI «Rehabilitation», pp. 8–14. – EDN: XWSVIH. (In Russ.).
  10. Kosarev, V. V., Prajd, V. (2008) [The influence of high technologies on the course of globalization: hopes and fears]. Novye tekhnologii i prodolzhenie evolyucii cheloveka? Transgumanisticheskij proekt budushchego [New technologies and the continuation of human evolution? Transhumanist project of the future]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, pp. 122–148. – EDN: RWKKKF. (In Russ.).
  11. Kriman, A. I. (2019) [The idea of a posthuman: a comparative analysis of transhumanism and posthumanism]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences]. Vol. 62. No. 4, pp. 132–147. – https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019- 62-4-132-147. – EDN: QBVSXB. (In Russ.).
  12. Kurcvejl, R. (2019) Evolyuciya razuma, ili Beskonechnye vozmozhnosti chelovecheskogo mozga, osnovannye na raspoznavanii obrazov. [Evolution of the mind, or the Infinite possibilities of the human brain based on pattern recognition]. Moscow: Eksmo, 352 p.
  13. Kutyryov, V. A. (2014) [On the sinking ship of humanism]. Mesto i rol’ gumanizma v budushchej civilizacii [The place and role of humanism in the future civilization]. Moscow: LENAND Publ., pp. 74–89. (In Russ.).
  14. Medvedev, D. A. (2008) [Convergence of technologies – a new determinant of the development of society]. Novye tekhnologii i prodolzhenie evolyucii cheloveka? Transgumanisticheskij proekt [New technologies and continuation of human evolution? Transhumanist project of the future]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, pp. 46–84. – EDN: RWKKKF. (In Russ.).
  15. Mezhuev, V. M. (2014) [Humanism and modern civilization]. Mesto i rol’ gumanizma v budushchej civilizacii [The place and role of humanism in the future civilization: coll. of art]. Moscow: LENAND Publ., pp. 35–57. (In Russ.).
  16. Pavlov, A. V. (2019) [Posthumanism: overcoming and legacy of postmodernism]. Voprosy filosofii [Matters of Philosophy]. Vol. 5, pp. 27–35. – https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440005053-3. – EDN: XXYARQ. (In Russ.).
  17. Prajd, V. (2008) [Intelligence as a factor in evolutionary development]. Novye tekhnologii i prodolzhenie evolyucii cheloveka? Transgumanisticheskij proekt budushchego [New technologies and the continuation of human evolution? Transhumanist project of the future]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, pp. 16–30. – EDN: RWKKKF. (In Russ.).
  18. Prajd, V. (2008) [Increasing life expectancy: social changes, forecasts]. Novye tekhnologii i prodolzhenie evolyucii cheloveka? Transgumanisticheskij proekt budushchego [New technologies and continuation of human evolution? Transhumanist project of the future]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, pp. 85–111. – EDN: RWKKKF. (In Russ.).
  19. Rostova, N. N. (2022) Myagkaya sila postgumanizma. Chto nam meshaet myslit’ po-russki? [The soft power of posthumanism. What prevents us from thinking in Russian?]. Moscow: Prospekt, 184 p. – EDN: AJXIAX.
  20. Rostova, N. N. (2019) [Man on the border of the animal world]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. Vol. 46, pp. 68–75. – https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/446/9. – EDN: OCWVKO. (In Russ.).
  21. Serl, D. (2002) Otkryvaya soznanie zanovo [Rediscovering consciousness]. Moscow: Idea-Press, 256 p. (In Russ., tran. from Eng.).
  22. Stepin, V. S. (2000) Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical knowledge]. Moscow: «Progress-Tradition», 744 p. – EDN: SIOLQR.
  23. Ferrando, F. (2022) Filosofskij postgumanizm [Philosophical posthumanism]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 360 p. (In Russ., tran. from Eng.).
  24. Habermas, Yu. (2002) Budushchee chelovecheskoj prirody. Na puti k liberal’noj evgenike? [The future of human nature. On the way to liberal eugenics?]. Moscow: The whole world, 144 p. – EDN: SGUYVP. (In Russ., tran. from Eng.).
  25. Harauej, D. (2017) Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i socialisticheskij feminizm 1980-h. [The Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. Available at: https://vk.com/doc60208871_514713224?hash=rNXZKEpTpGNTY9ZxuXSvRizECGgOXXM5w0JvIRB2WyH (accessed: 19.12.2023). (In Russ.).
  26. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2009) [The human in man: consciousness and neural network]. Problema soznaniya v filosofii i nauke [The problem of consciousness in philosophy and science]. Moscow: «Canon +» ROOI «Rehabilitation», pp. 325–360. (In Russ.).
  27. Sheler, M. (1994) [The position of man in space]. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. [Scheler M. Selected works]. Moscow: Publishing house «Gnosis», pp. 129–194. (In Russ.).
  28. Bostrom, N. (2003) Transhumanism F. A. Q. Available at: https://nickbostrom.com/views/transhumanist.pdf (accessed: 19.12.2023) (In Eng.).
  29. Bostrom, N. (2005) A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology. Vol. 14. Is. 1, pp. 1–25. Available at: https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf (accessed: 24.04.2023) (In Eng.).
  30. Bostrom, N. (2003) Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective. Journal of Value Inquiry. Vol. 37. No. 4, pp. 493–506. – EDN: FMDRPF. (accessed: 13.08.2020) (In Eng.).
  31. Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Available at: https://ageingcompanions.constantvzw.org/books/The_Posthuman_-_Rosi_Braidotti.pdf. – EDN: JTTPJD. (accessed: 28.11.2023) (In Eng.).
  32. Esfandiary, F. M. (1989) Are You a Transhuman? Monitoring and Stimulating Your Personal Rate of Growth in a Rapidly Changing World. Available at: http://fm-2030.narod.ru/olderfiles/1/ARE_YOU_A_TRANSHUMAN.htm (accessed: 19.12.2023) (In Eng.).
  33. Kurzweil, R. (2005) The Singularity is Near: when humans transcend biology. Available at: https://vk.com/doc344355953_437218166?hash=Qp7rNL8Q02yHZuOzFqR9TTjNxm8LxXEcvjAzHlv77PT (accessed: 19.12.2023) (In Eng.).
  34. Fukuyama, F. (2002) Our Post human Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 256 p. (In Eng.).
  35. Hassan, I. (1977) Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? The Georgia Review. Vol. 31. No. 4, pp. 830–850. Available at: https://pdfslide.net/documents/prometheus-as-performer-toward-a-posthumanist-culture-ihab-hassan-prometheus-as.html?page=1 (accessed: 28.11.2023) (In Eng.).
  36. Huxley, J. (1957) Transhumanism. Huxley J. New Bottles for New Wine. London: Chatto & Windus, pp. 13–17. Available at: https://archive.org/details/NewBottlesForNewWine/page/n5 (accessed: 23.08.2019) (In Eng.).
Error