UDC: 111.85; 78.01; 141.319.8; 165.12
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2026-1-106
EDN: OMSYNO


viewing

RUSSIAN NEO-KANTIAN PHILOSOPHY OF MUSIC IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY IN THE CONTEXT OF SYMBOLIC FORMS

G. G. Kolomiets
Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia
e-mail: kolomietsgg@yandex.ru

Abstract. In the expanding space of philosophical knowledge, in particular, aesthetics, epistemology, philosophical anthropology, and philosophy of culture, the philosophy of music, which is more than just art, is currently developing. As a rule, in Russian philosophical and aesthetic thought about music, A. F. Losev’s approach to the musical substance is preferred. This study focuses on the influence of neo-Kantianism on the development of philosophy of music in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. The goal was to present for the first time a neo-Kantian approach to the philosophy of music in the epistemological and anthropological aspects by such Russian neo-Kantian philosophers as I. I . Lapshin, who published the article «Philosophical Motifs in the Work of N.A. Rimsky-Korsakov» in 1910, and G. E. Lants, who published the work «Philosophy of Music» on January 1, 1914. The article discusses the influence of E. Cassirer’s neo- Kantian idea of symbolic forms on semantic aesthetics, particularly on S. Langer’s aesthetics, which views music as a prasymbol of the rhythm of life and an «incomplete symbol» in the human mind. The methodological framework of this study is based on the method of reconstruction and comparative analysis. The scientific significance of this research lies in the first identification of the philosophy of music as a self-sufficient field of study in Russian philosophical thought at the beginning of the last century. From this perspective, a comparative analysis of philosophical thought about music is presented in the works of Russian neo-Kantians. The introduction outlines the conditions and emergence of philosophical works about music by Russian neo-Kantian philosophers. The central part consistently reveals the Russian neo-Kantian interpretation of the philosophy of music. The first section is devoted to the philosophy of symbolic forms as the basis of semantic aesthetics and the philosophy of music; the second section, which is central, is devoted to the neo-Kantian philosophy of music in Russia based on the works of Lapshin and Lants, which essentially anticipated the philosophy of symbolism. The influence of E. Cassirer’s symbolic concept on musicology is noted in the interpretation of musical form as a process, as exemplified by B. V. Asafiev. The conclusion confirms the commonality of the views of the neo-Kantians in their desire to address the problem of meaning-making in the cultural and historical process through the philosophy of symbolic forms and symbolic relations. At the same time, the value of the Russian neo-Kantian philosophy of music from the early 20th century is emphasized, which is significant for modern philosophical knowledge.

Key words: Neo-Kantianism, aesthetics, epistemology, anthropology, philosophy of symbolic forms, the development of Russian philosophy of music.

Cite as: Kolomiets, G. G. (2026) [Russian neo-Kantian philosophy of music in the early 20th century in the context of symbolic forms]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 1, pp. 106–118. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2026-1-106.


References

  1. Basin, E. Ya. (2012) Semanticheskaya filosofiya iskusstva [Neo-Kantian Aesthetics of Symbolic Forms: E. Cassirer] M. : Humanitarian, 348 p.
  2. Belov, V. N. (2008) [Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Culture]. Kantovskiy sbornik [Kantian Journal]. Vol. 1 (27), pp. 74–81. (In Russ.).
  3. Belov, V. N. (2025) [What is Neo-Kantianism]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 1, pp.11–26. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-1-11. (In Russ.).
  4. Belov, V. N. (2003) [Ernst Cassirer. Philosophy of Symbolic Forms]. Vol. 1. Language. 272 p. Vol. 2. Mythological Thinking. 280 p. Vol. 3. Phenomenology of Cognition. 398 p. Moscow, St. Petersburg: University Book. 2002. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 12, pp. 177–182. (In Russ., transl. from German).
  5. Gilbert, K., Kuhn, G. (2000) Istoriya estetiki [History of Aesthetics]. Vol. 2. 2nd ed. Moscow: Progress Publishing Group, 316 p. (In Russ., transl. from Eng.).
  6. Deleuze, J. (2001) Empirizm i sub”yektivnost’: opyt o chelovecheskoy prirode po Yumu. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Kanta: ucheniye o sposobnostyakh. Bergsonizm. Spinoza [Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Human Nature According to Hume. Kant’s Critical Philosophy: The Doctrine of Capacities. Bergsonism. Spinoza]. Moscow: PER SE, 480 p. (In Russ., transl. from French).
  7. Zenkovsky, V. V. (1999) Istoriya russkoy filosofii. V 2-kh tomakh [History of Russian Philosophy. In 2 volumes]. Vol. 2. Ch. VIII. Rostov-on-Don: «Phoenix», pp. 248–280.
  8. Cassirer, E. (1998) Izbrannoye. Opyt o cheloveke [Selected Works. An Essay on Man]. Moscow: Gardarika, pp. 768–778.
  9. Cassirer, E. (2000) [The Concept of Symbolic Form in the Structure of the Sciences of the Spirit]. Izbrannoye : individ i kosmos [Selected Works: Individual and Cosmos]. St. Petersburg: University Book, pp. 394. (In Russ).
  10. Cassirer, E. (2002) Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form [Philosophy of Symbolic Forms]. Vol. 1. Language. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Un. Book, pp. 15.
  11. Cassirer, E. (2008) Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form [Philosophy of Symbolic Forms]. Vol. 3 Phenomenology of Cognition Moscow; St. Petersburg: University Book, 2008, pp. 86–142.
  12. Kolomiets, G. G. (2024) [Art and Science as a Subject of Aesthetic Epistemology]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 28. No. 3, pp. 796–810. – https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-796-810. (In Russ.).
  13. Kolomiets, G. G. (2023) [From the Philosophy of «Harmony of the World» to Post-Non-Classical Philosophy of Music in the Context of the Phenomenon of Transdisciplinarity]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. Series: Philosophy]. Vol. 5. No. 4, pp. 91–96. – https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2023.4.13. (In Russ.).
  14. Kolomiets, G. G. (2025) [Symbolic Philosophy of Art in the Context of Anthropology and Intercultural Interaction: Russia, China, Europe]. Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii [Intellect. Innovations. Investments]. Vol. 1, pp. 129– 139. – https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-1-129. (In Russ.).
  15. Kolomiets, G. G. (2025) [Philosophical Musical Symbolism and Rimsky-Korsakov’s Aesthetic Transformation]. «Polilog i sintez iskusstv: istoriya i sovremennost’, teoriya i praktika»: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, 2024 g. [«Polylogue and Synthesis of Arts: History and Modernity, Theory and Practice»: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2024]. St. Petersburg State Conservatory named after N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Arts, pp. 71–74. (In Russ.).
  16. Kolomiets, G. G. (2007) Tsennost’ muzyki: filosofskiy aspekt : Izd. 2-ye [The Value of Music: The Philosophical Aspect: 2nd ed]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, 536 p.
  17. Kravchenko, A. A. (1999) Logika gumanitarnykh nauk E. Kassirera. Kassirer i Gete [The Logic of E. Cassirer’s Humanitarian Sciences. Cassirer and Goethe]. M. : Dialog-MSU, 333 p.
  18. Langer, S. (2000) Filosofiya v novom klyuche: Issledovaniye simvoliki razuma, rituala i iskusstva [Philosophy in a New Key: A Study of the Symbolism of Reason, Ritual, and Art]. M. : Republic, 287 p. (In Russ., transl. from Eng.).
  19. Lanz, G. (1914) [E. Philosophy of Music]. Muzykal’nyy al’manakh, izd. Betkhovenskoy studii [Musical Almanac, published by the Beethoven Studio]. M. : pp. 28–57. (In Russ.).
  20. Lapshin, I. I. (1910) Rimskiy-Korsakov. Filosofskiye motivy v yego tvorchestve [N. A. Rimsky-Korsakov. Philosophical Motifs in His Work]. Russian Thought, pp. 46–60.
  21. Shestakov, V. (2000) [Aesthetic Philosophy of Susan Langer]. Langer S’yuzen. Filosofiya v novom klyuche: issledovaniye simvoliki, razuma, rituala i iskusstva [Langer Susan. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study of Symbolism, Reason, Ritual, and Art]. Moscow: Republic, pp. 266–273. (In Russ., transl. from Eng.).

In order for us to provide you with high-quality services, we use cookies that are stored on your computer (location information; ip-address; type, language, OS and browser version; device type and screen resolution; source from which you came to site the user; what pages the user opens and what buttons the user clicks; the same information is used to process statistical data on the use of the site through the Yandex.Metrika Internet service). By clicking the "I agree" button, you confirm that you are informed about the use of cookies on our website. You can disable cookies in your browser settings.